Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Theo Samaritan
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2007.09.04 14:16:00 -
[1]
OK, so from this topic I can gather a few things.
1: As this isnt Chribba, everyone calls the OP a whiner. if it WAS chribba no-one would say so and most will agree.
2: Despite the fact that he never denied it was a slight advantage, you all go on as if he claims that it was comparable to a lowsec LSAA. He doesn't, he claims that the same principles except 1 effect it in a war and thats that the POS is hard to take down. The supplies can still be royaly ******.
3: HIS POINT WAS that CCP should have informed people about this change. So you're all jealouse that he had an LSAA, NO ONE CARES. He doesnt care about the fact he has one, he cares about the idea of "WHAT ELSE HAS CCP CHANGED WITHOUT INFORMING ANYONE!?"
Added caps and Bold so you smacktards can read it. And yes, this is my main. ______________________________ A Request About Lag Discussion -- Yet another "Edit my sig devs!" request \o/ |

Theo Samaritan
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2007.09.04 14:26:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Dez Erichs *some stuff about highsec rorquals*
they were told to jump all highsec capitals into lowsec upon production. This includes rorquals.
The onyl reason chribba has veldnaught is because it was there before the patch. ______________________________ A Request About Lag Discussion -- Yet another "Edit my sig devs!" request \o/ |

Theo Samaritan
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2007.09.04 14:43:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Dez Erichs
Originally by: Theo Samaritan
Originally by: Dez Erichs *some stuff about highsec rorquals*
they were told to jump all highsec capitals into lowsec upon production. This includes rorquals.
The onyl reason chribba has veldnaught is because it was there before the patch.
True. May I direct you to this thread:
[Auction] Rorqual in 0.6
High-sec Rorquals are an exploit, and this is a response to close the hole. Ask yourself, if you were a GM, would you deal with every person who tried to build a high-sec Rorqual on a one-on-one basis, or would you get rid of the exploit? They cannot 'trust' people to move them to lowsec anymore, without creating a lot of work for themselves.
WWGMD? 
I'd do it one by one, because thats a break of the deal made between the owners of highsec LSAA's and the GM's.
Interesting that its a goon's work as well  ______________________________ A Request About Lag Discussion -- Yet another "Edit my sig devs!" request \o/ |
|
|